lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:52:41 +0800
From:   yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:     <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, <houtao1@...wei.com>,
        <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix warning when turn on dioread_nolock and
 inline_data

Thanks a lot! Will resend the patch soon!

On 2019/7/4 22:55, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 04-07-19 20:50:32, yangerkun wrote:
>> mkfs.ext4 -O inline_data /dev/vdb
>> mount -o dioread_nolock /dev/vdb /mnt
>> echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file
>> echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file
>> sync
>>
>> With upon script, system will trigger
>> "WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal)" since the wrong order
>> between rsv_blocks calculate and destroy inline data for dealloc.
> Thanks for the patch! Good catch! I'd just rephrase the last paragraph as:
>
> The above script will trigger "WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal)"
> because ext4_should_dioread_nolock() returns false for a file with inline
> data. Move the check to a place after we have already removed the inline
> data and prepared inode to write normal pages.
>
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me so feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> 								Honza
>
>> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index c7f77c6..3f2a366 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -2769,15 +2769,6 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
>>   		goto out_writepages;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
>> -		 * the page and we may dirty the inode.
>> -		 */
>> -		rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
>> -						PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	/*
>>   	 * If we have inline data and arrive here, it means that
>>   	 * we will soon create the block for the 1st page, so
>> @@ -2796,6 +2787,15 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
>>   		ext4_journal_stop(handle);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
>> +		 * the page and we may dirty the inode.
>> +		 */
>> +		rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
>> +						PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
>>   		range_whole = 1;
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists