[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723112155.20329-1-cgxu519@zoho.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:21:54 +0800
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...o.com.cn>
To: jack@...e.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...o.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: fix block range in ext2_data_block_valid()
For block validity we should check the block range
from start_block to start_block + count - 1, so fix
the range in ext2_data_block_valid() and also modify
the count argument properly in calling place.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...o.com.cn>
---
fs/ext2/balloc.c | 6 +++---
fs/ext2/xattr.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
index 547c165299c0..92e9a7489174 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
@@ -1203,13 +1203,13 @@ int ext2_data_block_valid(struct ext2_sb_info *sbi, ext2_fsblk_t start_blk,
unsigned int count)
{
if ((start_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
- (start_blk + count < start_blk) ||
- (start_blk > le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_blocks_count)))
+ (start_blk + count - 1 < start_blk) ||
+ (start_blk + count - 1 >= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_blocks_count)))
return 0;
/* Ensure we do not step over superblock */
if ((start_blk <= sbi->s_sb_block) &&
- (start_blk + count >= sbi->s_sb_block))
+ (start_blk + count - 1 >= sbi->s_sb_block))
return 0;
return 1;
diff --git a/fs/ext2/xattr.c b/fs/ext2/xattr.c
index 79369c13cc55..0456bc990b5e 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/xattr.c
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ ext2_xattr_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
if (!EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl)
goto cleanup;
- if (!ext2_data_block_valid(sbi, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl, 0)) {
+ if (!ext2_data_block_valid(sbi, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl, 1)) {
ext2_error(inode->i_sb, "ext2_xattr_delete_inode",
"inode %ld: xattr block %d is out of data blocks range",
inode->i_ino, EXT2_I(inode)->i_file_acl);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists