linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: use percpu_counters for extent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190828152023.GG24857@mit.edu>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:20:23 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yang Guo <guoyang2@...wei.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: use percpu_counters for extent_status cache
 hits/misses

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:19:17PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> From: Yang Guo <guoyang2@...wei.com>
> 
> @es_stats_cache_hits and @es_stats_cache_misses are accessed frequently in
> ext4_es_lookup_extent function, it would influence the ext4 read/write
> performance in NUMA system. Let's optimize it using percpu_counter,
> it is profitable for the performance.
> 
> The test command is as below:
> fio -name=randwrite -numjobs=8 -filename=/mnt/test1 -rw=randwrite
> -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -iodepth=64 -sync=0 -norandommap
> -group_reporting -runtime=120 -time_based -bs=4k -size=5G
> 
> And the result is better 10% than the initial implement:
> without the patch，IOPS=197k, BW=770MiB/s (808MB/s)(90.3GiB/120002msec)
> with the patch,  IOPS=218k, BW=852MiB/s (894MB/s)(99.9GiB/120002msec)
> 
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Guo <guoyang2@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>

Thanks, applied.

						- Ted