[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190911164517.16130-2-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:45:15 -0500
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, andres@...razel.de, david@...morbit.com,
riteshh@...ux.ibm.com, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: fix inode rwsem regression
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>
This is similar to 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression")
Apparently our current rwsem code doesn't like doing the trylock, then
lock for real scheme. So change our read/write methods to just do the
trylock for the RWF_NOWAIT case.
Fixes: edf064e7c6fe ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 58a18ed11546..651b2b1f4219 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1893,9 +1893,10 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (!inode_trylock(inode)) {
- if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
+ if (!inode_trylock(inode))
return -EAGAIN;
+ } else {
inode_lock(inode);
}
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists