linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ext4: introduce direct IO read path using iomap infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190916120032.GA4005@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:00:32 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>
Cc:     tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ext4: introduce direct IO read path using iomap
 infrastructure

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:03:44PM +1000, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> +static bool ext4_dio_checks(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION)
> +	if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode))
> +		return false;
> +#endif
> +	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
> +		return false;
> +	if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode))
> +		return false;
> +	return true;

Shouldn't this function be called ext4_dio_supported or similar?

Also bonus points of adding a patch that defines a IS_ENCRYPTED stub
for !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION to make this a little cleaner.

Also the iomap direct I/O code supports inline data, so the above
might not be required (at least with small updates elsewhere).