lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD+ocbxML=Zj4SxgFONAFtx9apNkEzfhiTs7p6Qf+-x6kUxf4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 00:50:21 -0700
From:   harshad shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
To:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:     Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] ext4: add fields that are needed to track
 changed files

Thanks, handled in V3.

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 2:23 PM Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2019, at 9:45 PM, Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ext4's fast commit feature tracks changed files and maintains them in
> > a queue. We also remember for each file the logical block range that
> > needs to be committed. This patch adds these fields to ext4_inode_info
> > and ext4_sb_info and also adds initialization calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > V2: Converted s_fc_lock from mutex to spinlock to improve parallelism
> >    performance.
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/ext4.h      | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h |  2 ++
> > fs/ext4/inode.c     |  1 +
> > fs/ext4/super.c     |  7 +++++++
> > 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > index becbda38b7db..0d15d4539dda 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > @@ -921,6 +921,27 @@ enum {
> >       I_DATA_SEM_QUOTA,
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Ext4 fast commit inode specific information
> > + */
> > +struct ext4_fast_commit_inode_info {
> > +     /* TID / SUB-TID when old_i_size and i_size were recorded */
> > +     tid_t fc_tid;
> > +     tid_t fc_subtid;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Start of logical block range that needs to be committed in this fast
> > +      * commit
> > +      */
> > +     loff_t fc_lblk_start;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * End of logical block range that needs to be committed in this fast
> > +      * commit
> > +      */
> > +     loff_t fc_lblk_end;
>
> Since these are logical block numbers within the journal, they certainly
> don't need to be 64-bit values.  loff_t is for byte offsets, this should
> use ext4_lblk_t, which will also reduce the size of the struct by 8 bytes.
>
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > /*
> >  * fourth extended file system inode data in memory
> > @@ -955,6 +976,9 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
> >
> >       struct list_head i_orphan;      /* unlinked but open inodes */
> >
> > +     struct list_head i_fc_list;     /* inodes that need fast commit */
>
> This comment should document what lock is protecting this list, along
> with the other fields.
>
> > +     struct ext4_fast_commit_inode_info i_fc;
>
> Since this increases the size of the inode, does it affect the number of
> inodes that can fit into one page of ext4_inode_cachep?
>
> >       /*
> >        * i_disksize keeps track of what the inode size is ON DISK, not
> >        * in memory.  During truncate, i_size is set to the new size by
> > @@ -1529,6 +1553,16 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> >       /* Barrier between changing inodes' journal flags and writepages ops. */
> >       struct percpu_rw_semaphore s_journal_flag_rwsem;
> >       struct dax_device *s_daxdev;
> > +
> > +     /* Ext4 fast commit stuff */
> > +     bool fc_replay;                 /* Fast commit replay in progress */
> > +     struct list_head s_fc_q;        /* Inodes that need fast commit. */
>
> This comment should document what lock is protecting this list, along
> with the other fields.
>
> > +     __u32 s_fc_q_cnt;               /* Number of inodes in the fc queue */
> > +     bool s_fc_eligible;             /*
> > +                                      * Are changes after the last commit
> > +                                      * eligible for fast commit?
> > +                                      */
>
> It is slightly more space efficient to put the bool values together
> rather than interleaving them between 64-bit values.
>
> > +     spinlock_t s_fc_lock;
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct ext4_sb_info *EXT4_SB(struct super_block *sb)
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> > index 7c70b08d104c..75b6db808837 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> > @@ -330,3 +330,16 @@ int __ext4_handle_dirty_super(const char *where, unsigned int line,
> >               mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> >       return err;
> > }
> > +
> > +void ext4_init_inode_fc_info(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +     handle_t *handle = ext4_journal_current_handle();
> > +     struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> > +
> > +     memset(&ei->i_fc, 0, sizeof(ei->i_fc));
> > +     if (ext4_handle_valid(handle)) {
> > +             ei->i_fc.fc_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
> > +             ei->i_fc.fc_subtid = handle->h_transaction->t_journal->j_subtid;
> > +     }
> > +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_fc_list);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> > index ef8fcf7d0d3b..2305c1acd415 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> > @@ -459,4 +459,6 @@ static inline int ext4_should_dioread_nolock(struct inode *inode)
> >       return 1;
> > }
> >
> > +void ext4_init_inode_fc_info(struct inode *inode);
> > +
> > #endif        /* _EXT4_JBD2_H */
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > index 420fe3deed39..f230a888eddd 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > @@ -4996,6 +4996,7 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
> >       for (block = 0; block < EXT4_N_BLOCKS; block++)
> >               ei->i_data[block] = raw_inode->i_block[block];
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_orphan);
> > +     ext4_init_inode_fc_info(&ei->vfs_inode);
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Set transaction id's of transactions that have to be committed
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 6bab59ae81f7..0b833e9b61c1 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -1100,6 +1100,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> >       ei->i_datasync_tid = 0;
> >       atomic_set(&ei->i_unwritten, 0);
> >       INIT_WORK(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work, ext4_end_io_rsv_work);
> > +     ext4_init_inode_fc_info(&ei->vfs_inode);
> >       return &ei->vfs_inode;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1139,6 +1140,7 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
> >       init_rwsem(&ei->i_data_sem);
> >       init_rwsem(&ei->i_mmap_sem);
> >       inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
> > +     ext4_init_inode_fc_info(&ei->vfs_inode);
> > }
> >
> > static int __init init_inodecache(void)
> > @@ -4301,6 +4303,11 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->s_orphan); /* unlinked but open files */
> >       mutex_init(&sbi->s_orphan_lock);
> >
> > +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->s_fc_q);
> > +     sbi->s_fc_q_cnt = 0;
> > +     sbi->s_fc_eligible = true;
> > +     spin_lock_init(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
> > +
> >       sb->s_root = NULL;
> >
> >       needs_recovery = (es->s_last_orphan != 0 ||
> > --
> > 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog
> >
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ