linux-ext4 - t_ext_jnl_rm test takes 96 seconds to finish

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f6b5895-12f3-bc3d-f50c-1de0886f41c3@adelielinux.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:16:51 -0500
From:   "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: t_ext_jnl_rm test takes 96 seconds to finish

Hello there,

While building e2fsprogs 1.45.4, I noticed the following output during
testing:

t_ext_jnl_rm: remove missing external journal device: ok
t_ext_jnl_rm:  *** took 96 seconds to finish ***
t_ext_jnl_rm:  consider adding t_ext_jnl_rm/is_slow_test

I didn't see any mention of this in the list archives, and I'm not
entirely sure if it should really be marked as a slow test.

System is a 64-thread POWER9 @ 3.8 GHz with DDR4-2400 RAM, so it isn't
exactly a "low end" machine.

Let me know if you need any further detail from my end; I'll be happy to
provide it.  Thank you.

Best to you and yours,
--arw

-- 
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
https://www.adelielinux.org

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)