[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56189643-af2b-f754-bc95-60ab4f126c32@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:42:55 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] ext4: add kunit test for decoding
extended timestamps
On 10/17/19 5:27 PM, Iurii Zaikin wrote:
>> You can do all of this and allow users to supply another set of data.
>> It doesn't gave to be one or the other.
>>
> What is the use case for running a unit test on a different data set than
> what it comes with?
>
Let me ask the question in a different way. I would like to see the
ability supply test data at run-time. It can be the same data every
single time the test runs.
I am not seeing the reasons to embed the test data in the test itself.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists