[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021135337.GH25184@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:53:37 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out
from ->iomap_end() callback
On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:56, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> In preparation for implementing the iomap direct I/O modifications,
> the inode extension/truncate code needs to be moved out from the
> ext4_iomap_end() callback. For direct I/O, if the current code
> remained, it would behave incorrrectly. Updating the inode size prior
> to converting unwritten extents would potentially allow a racing
> direct I/O read to find unwritten extents before being converted
> correctly.
>
> The inode extension/truncate code now resides within a new helper
> ext4_handle_inode_extension(). This function has been designed so that
> it can accommodate for both DAX and direct I/O extension/truncate
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 48 +--------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
One nit below:
> +static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, ssize_t written,
> + loff_t offset, size_t count)
IMHO a bit more logical ordering of arguments would be 'inode, offset,
written, count'...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists