[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191023063925.84F6C4C044@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:09:24 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
On 10/22/19 7:25 AM, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
>> One nit below.
>>> + ext4_es_find_extent_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed,
>>> + map->m_lblk, end, &es);
>>> +
>>> + if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end)
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) {
>>> + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk;
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk)
>>
>> This condition must be always true AFAICT.
>
> That would make sense. I will remove this condition in v6.
>
>>> + offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk;
>>> +
>>> + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset;
And so, this above line will also be redundant.
>>> + map->m_len = es.es_len - offset;
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>
> --<M>--
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists