[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023103548.GD6725@bobrowski>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:35:48 +1100
From: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:09:24PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> On 10/22/19 7:25 AM, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > > One nit below.
> > > > + ext4_es_find_extent_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed,
> > > > + map->m_lblk, end, &es);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end)
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) {
> > > > + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk;
> > > > + return false;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk)
> > > > + offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk;
> > > > + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset;
>
> And so, this above line will also be redundant.
And, you're absolutely right. Nice catch. Who knew basic math could go such a
long way? :P
Thanks Ritesh!
--<M>--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists