[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191029204141.145309-5-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:41:41 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] docs: fs-verity: mention statx() support
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Document that the statx() system call can now be used to check whether a
file is a verity file.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst
index 42a0b6dd9e0b68..3355377a24398d 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst
@@ -226,6 +226,14 @@ To do so, check for FS_VERITY_FL (0x00100000) in the returned flags.
The verity flag is not settable via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS. You must use
FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY instead, since parameters must be provided.
+statx
+-----
+
+Since Linux v5.5, the statx() system call sets STATX_ATTR_VERITY if
+the file has fs-verity enabled. This can perform better than
+FS_IOC_GETFLAGS and FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY because it doesn't require
+opening the file, and opening verity files can be expensive.
+
Accessing verity files
======================
--
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists