linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191030150437.GB16197@mit.edu>
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:04:37 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: bio_alloc never fails

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 03:43:10PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/30/19 9:56 AM, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Similar to [1] [2], it seems a trivial cleanup since
> > bio_alloc can handle memory allocation as mentioned in
> > fs/direct-io.c (also see fs/block_dev.c, fs/buffer.c, ..)
> > 
> 
> AFAIU, the reason is that, bio_alloc with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
> flags guarantees bio allocation under some given restrictions,
> as stated in fs/direct-io.c
> So here it is ok to not check for NULL value from bio_alloc.
> 
> I think we can update above info too in your commit msg.

Please also add a short comment in the code itself, so it's clear why
it's OK to skip the error check, and reference the comments for
bio_alloc_bioset().  This is the fairly subtle bit which makes this
change not obvious:

 *   When @bs is not NULL, if %__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is set then bio_alloc will
 *   always be able to allocate a bio. This is due to the mempool guarantees.
 *   To make this work, callers must never allocate more than 1 bio at a time
 *   from this pool. Callers that need to allocate more than 1 bio must always
 *   submit the previously allocated bio for IO before attempting to allocate
 *   a new one. Failure to do so can cause deadlocks under memory pressure.
 *
 *   Note that when running under generic_make_request() (i.e. any block
 *   driver), bios are not submitted until after you return - see the code in
 *   generic_make_request() that converts recursion into iteration, to prevent
 *   stack overflows.
 *
 *   This would normally mean allocating multiple bios under
 *   generic_make_request() would be susceptible to deadlocks, but we have
 *   deadlock avoidance code that resubmits any blocked bios from a rescuer
 *   thread.

Otherwise, someone else may not understand why it's safe to not check
the error return then submit cleanup patch to add the error checking
back.  :-)

					- Ted