[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191106172302.GE12685@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:23:02 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, mbobrowski@...browski.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Ext4: Add support for blocksize < pagesize for
dioread_nolock
On Wed 16-10-19 13:07:06, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> This patch series adds the support for blocksize < pagesize for
> dioread_nolock feature.
>
> Since in case of blocksize < pagesize, we can have multiple
> small buffers of page as unwritten extents, we need to
> maintain a vector of these unwritten extents which needs
> the conversion after the IO is complete. Thus, we maintain
> a list of tuple <offset, size> pair (io_end_vec) for this &
> traverse this list to do the unwritten to written conversion.
>
> Appreciate any reviews/comments on this patches.
I know Ted has merged the patches already so this is just informational but
I've read the patches and they look fine to me. Thanks for the work! I was
just thinking that we could actually make the vector tracking more
efficient because the io_end always looks like:
one-big-extent-to-fully-write + whatever it takes to fully write out the
last page
So your vectors could be also expressed as "extent to write" + bitmap of
blocks written in the last page. And 64-bits are enough for the bitmap for
anything ext4 supports so we could easily save allocation of ioend_vec etc.
Just a suggestion.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists