[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16e3f00ed3d.da5d5acd1285.2289879597060795256@mykernel.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:37:35 +0800
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
To: "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "adilger.kernel" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"tytso" <tytso@....edu>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.com>,
"linux-ext4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: choose hardlimit when softlimit is larger than
hardlimit in ext4_statfs_project()
---- 在 星期二, 2019-10-15 19:25:23 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> 撰写 ----
> On Tue 15-10-19 18:23:27, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> > Setting softlimit larger than hardlimit seems meaningless
> > for disk quota but currently it is allowed. In this case,
> > there may be a bit of comfusion for users when they run
> > df comamnd to directory which has project quota.
> >
> > For example, we set 20M softlimit and 10M hardlimit of
> > block usage limit for project quota of test_dir(project id 123).
> >
> > [root@...es mnt_ext4]# repquota -P -a
> > *** Report for project quotas on device /dev/loop0
> > Block grace time: 7days; Inode grace time: 7days
> > Block limits File limits
> > Project used soft hard grace used soft hard grace
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 0 -- 13 0 0 2 0 0
> > 123 -- 10237 20480 10240 5 200 100
> >
> > The result of df command as below:
> >
> > [root@...es mnt_ext4]# df -h test_dir
> > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/loop0 20M 10M 10M 50% /home/cgxu/test/mnt_ext4
> >
> > Even though it looks like there is another 10M free space to use,
> > if we write new data to diretory test_dir(inherit project id),
> > the write will fail with errno(-EDQUOT).
> >
> > After this patch, the df result looks like below.
> >
> > [root@...es mnt_ext4]# df -h test_dir
> > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/loop0 10M 10M 3.0K 100% /home/cgxu/test/mnt_ext4
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
> > ---
> > - Fix a bug in the limit setting logic.
>
> Thanks for the patch! It looks good to me. You can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
Hi Jan,
I have a proposal for another direction.
Could we add a check for soft limit in quota layer when setting the value?
So that we could not bother with specific file systems on statfs().
Thanks,
Chengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists