[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005F77DB9A260B4E91664DDF22573C66E9D38A07@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:19:43 +0000
From: Guiyao <guiyao@...wei.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
"ebiggers@...gle.com" <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
"aceballos@...il.com" <aceballos@...il.com>,
"vertaling@...vern.nl" <vertaling@...vern.nl>
Subject: 答复: 答复: [PATCH v2] e2fsprogs: Check device id in advance to skip fake device name
Hi, Ted,
Yes, I agree with you, let's remove the "#ifdef/#ifndef " code. :)
And I have tested your patch, it can work well in case 1, but cannot work in case 2.
#mount -t tmpfs /dev/sdb tmp
#mount /dev/sdb sdb
Case1:
#resize2fs /dev/sdb 7G
// it can success, and the correct sdb resized.
Case2:
#umount sdb
#ln -s /dev/sdb abc
#resize2fs abc 8G
Filesystem at abc is mounted on /root/tmp; on-line resizing required
old_desc_blocks = 2, new_desc_blocks = 2
resize2fs: Kernel does not support online resizing
it is the reason I added some code here, and had to add "dir_st_buf ".
> if (stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &st_buf) == 0) {
> if (ext2fsP_is_disk_device(st_buf.st_mode)) { #ifndef
> __GNU__
> - if (file_rdev && (file_rdev == st_buf.st_rdev))
> - break;
> + if (file_rdev && (file_rdev == st_buf.st_rdev)) {
> + if (file_rdev == dir_st_buf.st_dev)
> + break;
> + }
To be honest, I think the scene of case 2 is really strange.
Thank you.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 02:43:46PM +0000, Guiyao wrote:
>
> Actually, we found some insane system administrators, they not only do
> something like "mount -t tmpfs /dev/sdb /tmp ", but also they do " ln
> -s /dev/sdb abc ", then "resize2fs abc xxx". :(
So I don't consider ourselves necessarily obligated to twist ourselves into knots for insane system administrators. :-)
Did you test the patch that I sent out? It handles that case already:
% grep /dev/loop /proc/mounts
/dev/loop0 /mnt2 tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt ext4 rw,relatime 0 0
% ln -s /dev/loop0 abc
% ./tst_ismounted abc
Device abc reports flags 11
abc is apparently in use.
abc is mounted.
abc is mounted on /mnt2.
> So we have to add the fixing code in both sides of "name matched" and "name not matched".
>
> For the compiling issue, it's my fault in previous patch, and added the macro in a wrong line.
>
> So, I rewrote it again, and please give more advise. Thank you in advance.
Given that I have a patch which I've already tested, and which is a substantial clean up in terms of removing #ifdef cases and number of lines of code:
lib/ext2fs/ismounted.c | 39 ++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
I'm inclined to stick with mine.
But here's the quick review.
> {
> struct mntent *mnt;
> +#ifndef __GNU__
> + struct stat dir_st_buf;
> +#endif /* __GNU__ */
Lots of extra #ifdef/#ifndef is undesirable. As it turns out, it isn't necessary to have a separate dir_st_buf at all.
> @@ -128,13 +131,32 @@ static errcode_t check_mntent_file(const char *mtab_file, const char *file,
> while ((mnt = getmntent (f)) != NULL) {
> if (mnt->mnt_fsname[0] != '/')
> continue;
> - if (strcmp(file, mnt->mnt_fsname) == 0)
> +#ifndef __GNU__
> + if (stat(mnt->mnt_dir, &dir_st_buf) != 0)
> + continue;
> +#endif
> + if (strcmp(file, mnt->mnt_fsname) == 0) { #ifndef __GNU__
> + if (file_rdev && (file_rdev != dir_st_buf.st_dev)) {
This doesn't need to be under #ifndef __GNU__. In the GNU hurd case, file_rdev will be zero, so the compiler will remove the if statement for us, without needing an additional #ifndef __GNU__ test.
> if (stat(mnt->mnt_fsname, &st_buf) == 0) {
> if (ext2fsP_is_disk_device(st_buf.st_mode)) { #ifndef
> __GNU__
> - if (file_rdev && (file_rdev == st_buf.st_rdev))
> - break;
> + if (file_rdev && (file_rdev == st_buf.st_rdev)) {
> + if (file_rdev == dir_st_buf.st_dev)
> + break;
> + }
> +
The reason why this isn't necessary is because we're using stat, and stat follows symlinks. So when you do "ln -s /dev/sdb abc", and then we stat abc, st_buf.st_rdev contains the device node of /dev/sbc, not the symbolic link of abc. So adding a check for dir_st_buf.st_dev is not needed.
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists