lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191114172754.GB4579@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:27:54 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Jesse Grodman <jgrodman@...il.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Suggested change for superblock journal hint On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Jesse Grodman wrote: > Hi, > > I encountered the scenario that a full fsck check was being run > unnecessarily when the major / minor number of my external journal was > being fixed by fsck. This PR changes that so that this change does > trigger the full fsck run: github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/pull/26 Hi Jessie, It's preferable that patches e2fsprogs be sent to the linux-ext4 list, so they can get reviewed by the full ext4 community. That being said, I will accept minor patches sent via a pull request if they full meet the requirements for kernel patches: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html Note in particular the requirements for the Developer's Certification of Origin (aka the Signed-off-by tag). That has specific legal meanings (for example, you are certifying that your employer allows you to contribute to open source projects, or at least, *this* open source project), so please take a close look at that. Cheers, - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists