linux-ext4 - [PATCH v4 linux-kselftest-test 4/6] kunit: remove timeout dependence on sysctl_hung_task_timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:16:10 +0000
From:   Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
        penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, schowdary@...dia.com,
        urezki@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        corbet@....net, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, changbin.du@...el.com,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 linux-kselftest-test 4/6] kunit: remove timeout dependence on sysctl_hung_task_timeout_seconds

In discussion of how to handle timeouts, it was noted that if
sysctl_hung_task_timeout_seconds is exceeded for a kunit test,
the test task will be killed and an oops generated.  This should
suffice as a means of debugging such timeout issues for now.

Hence remove use of sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs, which has the
added benefit of avoiding the need to export that symbol from
the core kernel.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
---
 lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 22 ++++------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
index 0247a28..0dd434e 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
-#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
@@ -33,8 +32,6 @@ static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data)
 
 static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout_msecs;
-
 	/*
 	 * TODO(brendanhiggins@...gle.com): We should probably have some type of
 	 * variable timeout here. The only question is what that timeout value
@@ -51,22 +48,11 @@ static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void)
 	 *
 	 * For more background on this topic, see:
 	 * https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html
+	 *
+	 * If tests timeout due to exceeding sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs,
+	 * the task will be killed and an oops generated.
 	 */
-	if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) {
-		/*
-		 * If sysctl_hung_task is active, just set the timeout to some
-		 * value less than that.
-		 *
-		 * In regards to the above TODO, if we decide on variable
-		 * timeouts, this logic will likely need to change.
-		 */
-		timeout_msecs = (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs - 1) *
-				MSEC_PER_SEC;
-	} else {
-		timeout_msecs = 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */
-	}
-
-	return timeout_msecs;
+	return 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */
 }
 
 void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context)
-- 
1.8.3.1