lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:34 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <>
To:     Jan Kara <>
Cc:     Sebastian Siewior <>,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,
        Matthew Wilcox <>,
        LKML <>,,,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Julia Cartwright <>,
        Alexander Viro <>,
        Jan Kara <>, Mark Fasheh <>,
        Joseph Qi <>,
        Christoph Hellwig <>,
        Joel Becker <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 03:56:38PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> With some effort, we could even shrink struct buffer_head from 104 bytes
> (on x86_64) to 96 bytes but I don't think that effort is worth it (I'd find
> it better use of time to actually work on getting rid of buffer heads
> completely).

Is that really realistic?  All aside from the very large number of
file systems which use buffer_heads that would have to be reworked,
the concept of buffer heads is pretty fundamental to how jbd2 is

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists