linux-ext4 - [Bug 205569] potential data race (likely benign) on inode->i_state (reading and writing to different bits)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bug-205569-13602-uptZ0YofDD@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:02:30 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 205569] potential data race (likely benign) on inode->i_state
 (reading and writing to different bits)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205569

--- Comment #2 from Meng Xu (mengxu.gatech@...il.com) ---
(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #1)
> The writeback thread is only applicable for data files.   While rmdir() is
> only applicable for directories.   Also, in both of these function traces,
> what you referenced is i_state bits being *read*:
> 
>  [WRITE] dirty = inode->i_state & I_DIRTY;
>   ^^^^^ not correct!
> 
> That being said, there are places in fs/fs-writeback.c where i_state is
> modified, and there are code paths where ext4_orphan_add() can be called on
> regular data files --- just not the ones you've listed in this bug.
> 
> Can you recheck the call traces and make sure they are correct?

Hi Ted,

My bad, the [WRITE] location is a few lines down the path,
inode->i_state &= ~dirty;

Best Regards,
Meng

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.