linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: use rcu API in debug_print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191201035107.24355-1-tranmanphong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun,  1 Dec 2019 10:51:07 +0700
From:   Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
To:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, paulmck@...nel.org,
        joel@...lfernandes.org
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: use rcu API in debug_print_tree

struct ext4_sb_info.system_blks was marked __rcu.
But access the pointer without using RCU lock and dereference.
Sparse warning with __rcu notation:

block_validity.c:139:29: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
block_validity.c:139:29:    expected struct rb_root const *
block_validity.c:139:29:    got struct rb_root [noderef] <asn:4> *

Signed-off-by: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index d4d4fdfac1a6..1ee04e76bbe0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node;
 	struct ext4_system_zone *entry;
+	struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
 	int first = 1;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "System zones: ");
-	node = rb_first(&sbi->system_blks->root);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
+	node = rb_first(&system_blks->root);
 	while (node) {
 		entry = rb_entry(node, struct ext4_system_zone, node);
 		printk(KERN_CONT "%s%llu-%llu", first ? "" : ", ",
@@ -144,6 +147,7 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 		first = 0;
 		node = rb_next(node);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1