[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f8eb86e-53c0-a547-a1e5-b7411d36ac3e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:23:19 +0800
From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, <tytso@....edu>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <jack@...e.com>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <liangyun2@...wei.com>,
<luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] jbd2: make sure ESHUTDOWN to be recorded in the
journal superblock
On 2019/12/5 1:05, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-12-19 20:46:13, zhangyi (F) wrote:
>> Commit fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer") want
>> to allow jbd2 layer to distinguish shutdown journal abort from other
>> error cases. So the ESHUTDOWN should be taken precedence over any other
>> errno which has already been recoded after EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN is set,
>> but it only update errno in the journal suoerblock now if the old errno
>> is 0.
>>
>> Fixes: fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer")
>> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
>
> Yeah, I think this is correct if I understand the logic correctly but I'd
> like Ted to have a look at this. Anyway, feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
Thanks for review.
Hi Ted, do you have time to look at this patch?
Thanks,
Yi.
>
>> ---
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index b2d6e7666d0f..93be6e0311da 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -2109,8 +2109,7 @@ static void __journal_abort_soft (journal_t *journal, int errno)
>>
>> if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT) {
>> write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
>> - if (!old_errno && old_errno != -ESHUTDOWN &&
>> - errno == -ESHUTDOWN)
>> + if (old_errno != -ESHUTDOWN && errno == -ESHUTDOWN)
>> jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno(journal);
>> return;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.2
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists