linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO mixed R/W workload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191206084953.CEF21A405F@d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:19:52 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>, jack@...e.cz,
        tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, mbobrowski@...browski.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO
 mixed R/W workload



On 12/6/19 2:16 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Tested with the following case:
> 
> fio -name=parallel_dio_reads_test -filename=/mnt/nvme0n1/testfile \
> -direct=1 -iodepth=1 -thread -rw=randrw -ioengine=psync -bs=$bs \
> -size=20G -numjobs=8 -runtime=600 -group_reporting
> 
> The performance result is the same as reverting parallel dio reads[1]
> or even slightly better in both bandwidth and latency, which is as

That's great!!


> expected.
> 
> So, Tested-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>

Thanks :)

-ritesh