linux-ext4 - the side effect of enlarger max mount count in ext4 superblock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAJeciUWm9W-AyFwJdUqC3W6n4bBDHMrzBF=V2d_iMywDW2+uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:25:01 +0800
From:   xiaohui li <lixiaohui1@...omi.corp-partner.google.com>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: the side effect of enlarger max mount count in ext4 superblock

hi ted:

we have found the e2fsck full check cost-so-much-time problem in
android booting phase, especially it will spend 120 seconds on doing
this e2fsck full check in ext4 rw partition which has large storage
capacity and serious fragmentation related with used extents.

so we want to reduce the numbers of the called work of e2fsck full check.

condition 1:
and then we have find when encountering the metadata error or
inconsistent problems, ext4 will has put an error flag in its
superblock.
when the next e2fsck data check begin, it will check if there is an
error flag in partition superblock, and will do the full check work
automatically if has this error flag.

condition 2:
meanwhile, in android code, when ext4 partition has been mounted
unsuccessfully, it will also do e2fsck full check subsequently.

according to above two showed conditions on which e2fsck full check
can be called automatically,
the e2fsck full check has not to be called periodically when the ext4
partition mount times is above max mount times we set in ext4 super
block.
when ext4 data or medata error has happened, e2fsck full check will be
called automatically during next e2fsck data checking.

so i wonder the reason why set EXT4_DFL_MAX_MNT_COUNT value to 20 in
fs/ext4/ext4.h and not set a large value to it ?
is there any reason or any condition when file system data error or
stability problems happens and ext4 can't get this information, can't
set the error flag in superblock, and so will not call the e2fsck full
check during next e2fsck check？
and because of this reason or condition, it will have to do periodic
e2fsck full check.

many thanks if you and any other people can give me advise on the
above question.