lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:30:48 -1000 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@...ckx.be> Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>, Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Rework random blocking > On Jan 9, 2020, at 12:02 PM, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@...ckx.be> wrote: > > > If the kernel provides a good RNG, the only reason I can see why > you would like to have direct access to a hwrng is to verify that > it's working correctly. That might mean that you put it in some > special mode where it returns raw unprocessed values. If the device > is in such a mode, it's output will not provide the same entropy > per bit, and so I would expect the kernel to stop using it directly. I disagree. If I buy a ChaosKey or a fancy EAL4FIPSOMG key, I presumably have it for a reason and I want to actually use the thing for real. Maybe it’s for some certification reason and maybe it’s just because it’s really cool. As for “direct” access, I think AMD provides an interface to read raw output from the on-die entropy source. Exposing this to user space is potentially quite useful for anyone who wants to try to characterize it. I don’t really think people should use a raw sample interface as a source of production random numbers, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists