[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200113194724.GG76141@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:47:24 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix deadlock allocating bio_post_read_ctx from
mempool
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:12:22PM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> Without any form of coordination, any case where multiple allocations
> from the same mempool are needed at a time to make forward progress can
> deadlock under memory pressure.
>
> This is the case for struct bio_post_read_ctx, as one can be allocated
> to decrypt a Merkle tree page during fsverity_verify_bio(), which itself
> is running from a post-read callback for a data bio which has its own
> struct bio_post_read_ctx.
>
> Fix this by freeing the first bio_post_read_ctx before calling
> fsverity_verify_bio(). This works because verity (if enabled) is always
> the last post-read step.
>
> This deadlock can be reproduced by trying to read from an encrypted
> verity file after reducing NUM_PREALLOC_POST_READ_CTXS to 1 and patching
> mempool_alloc() to pretend that pool->alloc() always fails.
>
> Note that since NUM_PREALLOC_POST_READ_CTXS is actually 128, to actually
> hit this bug in practice would require reading from lots of encrypted
> verity files at the same time. But it's theoretically possible, as N
> available objects isn't enough to guarantee forward progress when > N/2
> threads each need 2 objects at a time.
>
> Fixes: 22cfe4b48ccb ("ext4: add fs-verity read support")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists