[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115064827.GA21176@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:48:27 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ext4: hold i_rwsem until AIO completes
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:50:23PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> I note that you've dropped the inode_dio_wait() in ext4's ZERO_RANGE,
> COLLAPSE_RANGE, INSERT_RANGE, etc. We had added these to avoid
> problems when various fallocate operations which modify the inode's
> logical->physical block mapping racing with direct I/O (both reads or
> writes).
>
> I don't see a replacement protection in this patch series. How does
> are file systems supported to protect against such races?
By holding i_rwsem until the direct I/O operations are finished, and
not just until they are sumbitted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists