linux-ext4 - Re: RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200115153614.GA31296@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:36:14 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:24:28AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Your requirement seems a little different, and in fact in many ways
> > similar to the percpu_ref primitive.
> 
> I was interested because you are talking about allowing the read/write side
> of a rw sem to be held across a return to user space/etc, which is the
> same basic problem.
> 
> precpu refcount looks more like a typical refcount with a release that
> is called by whatever context does the final put. The point above is
> to basically move the release of a refcount into a synchrnous path by
> introducing some barrier to wait for the refcount to go to zero. In
> the above the barrier is the down_write() as it is really closer to a
> rwsem than a refcount.

No, percpu_ref is a little different than the name suggests, as it has
a magic initial reference, and then the other short term reference.  To
actually tear it down now just a normal put of the reference is needed,
but an explicit percpu_ref_kill or percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm.  Various
callers (including all I added) would like that operation to be
synchronous and currently hack that up, so a version of the percpu_ref
that actually waits for the other references to away like we hacked
up various places seems to exactly suit your requirements.