[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bbea221-f99e-45d5-039a-9663d0104ce5@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:26:23 +0800
From: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: modify assert condition in
__journal_remove_journal_head
On 2020/1/22 16:50, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 22-01-20 02:05:48, Shijie Luo wrote:
>> Only when jh->b_jcount = 0 in jbd2_journal_put_journal_head, we are allowed
>> to call __journal_remove_journal_head.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@...wei.com>
> Thanks for the patch. You're right but given that
> __journal_remove_journal_head() has exactly one caller and that checks for
> jh->b_jcount == 0 just before calling __journal_remove_journal_head(), I
> think the assertion is pretty pointless. So I'd rather just remove it
> completely.
>
> Honza
Thanks for your review. It 's much better to remove the assertion.
>> ---
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index 5e408ee24a1a..4f417a7f1ae0 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static void __journal_remove_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
>> {
>> struct journal_head *jh = bh2jh(bh);
>>
>> - J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount >= 0);
>> + J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount == 0);
>> J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == NULL);
>> J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL);
>> J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_cp_transaction == NULL);
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists