lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 20:30:49 -0800
From:   Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] vfs: Fold casefolding into vfs

> ... buggering the filesystems (and boxen) that never planned to use
> that garbage.
>
I'm planning to rework this as dentry ops again. Your other comments
point out some issues that also exist in the old dentry_operations, so
that's a good opportunity to fix those up. How do you feel about just
having the two entries in struct super_block? With them there, I can
add the dentry_operations to fs/unicode where they won't bother anyone
else, while not making every filesystem that uses it have to carry
near identical code.

>
> Are you serious?
>         1) who said that ->d_inode is stable here?  If we are in RCU mode,
> it won't be.
>         2) page-sized kmalloc/kfree *ON* *COMPONENT* *AFTER* *COMPONENT*?
>

#2 is the part that made me the saddest in the patch. I'm planning to
move this to the unicode subsystem so it can just walk through the
name as it computes the hash without needing any allocation.

>
> ... and again, you are pulling in a lot of cachelines.
>

I probably should've just given it a DCACHE flag, like what fscrypt is
using. A simple flag there would've done everything that I'm doing
without making the cache super sad and making any attempts at making
it actually work with RCU much simpler.

> <understatement> IMO the whole thing is not a good idea. </understatement>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists