[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc3e2187-b1a7-b21e-db9f-c8c01b97368f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:51:10 +0800
From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <tytso@....edu>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<luoshijie1@...wei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting
a metadata buffer
On 2020/2/6 19:46, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 03-02-20 22:04:58, zhangyi (F) wrote:
>> Commit 904cdbd41d74 ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from
>> an older transaction") set the BH_Freed flag when forgetting a metadata
>> buffer which belongs to the committing transaction, it indicate the
>> committing process clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer. But
>> it also clear the BH_Mapped flag at the same time, which may trigger
>> below NULL pointer oops when block_size < PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>> rmdir 1 kjournald2 mkdir 2
>> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
>> commit transaction N
>> jbd2_journal_forget
>> set_buffer_freed(bh1)
>> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
>> commit transaction N+1
>> ...
>> clear_buffer_mapped(bh1)
>> ext4_getblk(bh2 ummapped)
>> ...
>> grow_dev_page
>> init_page_buffers
>> bh1->b_private=NULL
>> bh2->b_private=NULL
>> jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh1)
>> __journal_remove_journal_head(hb1)
>> jh1 is NULL and trigger oops
>>
>> *) Dir entry block bh1 and bh2 belongs to one page, and the bh2 has
>> already been unmapped.
>>
>> For the metadata buffer we forgetting, clear the dirty flags is enough,
>> so this patch add BH_Unmap flag for the journal_unmap_buffer() case and
>> keep the mapped flag for the metadata buffer.
>>
>> Fixes: 904cdbd41d74 ("jbd2: clear dirty flag when revoking a buffer from an older transaction")
>> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
[..]
>
> Also rather than introducing this new buffer_unmap bit, I'd use the fact
> this special treatment is needed only for buffers coming from the block device
> mapping. And we can check for that like:
>
> /*
> * We can (and need to) unmap buffer only for normal mappings.
> * Block device buffers need to stay mapped all the time.
> * We need to be careful about the check because the page
> * mapping can get cleared under our hands.
> */
> mapping = READ_ONCE(bh->b_page->mapping);
> if (mapping && !sb_is_blkdev_sb(mapping->host->i_sb)) {
> ...
> }
Think about it again, it may missing clearing of mapped flag if 'mapping'
of journalled data page was cleared, and finally trigger exception if
we reuse the buffer again. So I think it should be:
if (!(mapping && sb_is_blkdev_sb(mapping->host->i_sb))) {
...
}
Thanks,
Yi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists