[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN4PR0401MB3598602411B75B46F5267B829B180@SN4PR0401MB3598.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:19:14 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] mm: Fix the return type of
__do_page_cache_readahead
On 11/02/2020 02:05, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> even though I'm pretty sure we're not going to readahead more than 2^32
> pages ever.
And 640K is more memory than anyone will ever need on a computer *scnr*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists