[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218212652.GR10776@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:26:52 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] Change readahead API
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:42:30AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 03:56:33PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Latest version in your git tree:
> >
> > $ ▶ glo -n 5 willy/readahead
> > 4be497096c04 mm: Use memalloc_nofs_save in readahead path
> > ff63497fcb98 iomap: Convert from readpages to readahead
> > 26aee60e89b5 iomap: Restructure iomap_readpages_actor
> > 8115bcca7312 fuse: Convert from readpages to readahead
> > 3db3d10d9ea1 f2fs: Convert from readpages to readahead
> > $
> >
> > merged into a 5.6-rc2 tree fails at boot on my test vm:
> >
> > [ 2.423116] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 2.424957] list_add double add: new=ffffea000efff4c8, prev=ffff8883bfffee60, next=ffffea000efff4c8.
> > [ 2.428259] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:29 __list_add_valid+0x67/0x70
> > [ 2.457484] Call Trace:
> > [ 2.458171] __pagevec_lru_add_fn+0x15f/0x2c0
> > [ 2.459376] pagevec_lru_move_fn+0x87/0xd0
> > [ 2.460500] ? pagevec_move_tail_fn+0x2d0/0x2d0
> > [ 2.461712] lru_add_drain_cpu+0x8d/0x160
> > [ 2.462787] lru_add_drain+0x18/0x20
>
> Are you sure that was 4be497096c04 ? I ask because there was a
Yes, because it's the only version I've actually merged into my
working tree, compiled and tried to run. :P
> version pushed to that git tree that did contain a list double-add
> (due to a mismerge when shuffling patches). I noticed it and fixed
> it, and 4be497096c04 doesn't have that problem. I also test with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST turned on, but this problem you hit is going to be
> probabilistic because it'll depend on the timing between whatever other
> list is being used and the page actually being added to the LRU.
I'll see if I can reproduce it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists