linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: Fix potential races when performing online resizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200220061428.GG476845@mit.edu>
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:14:28 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@...zon.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sblbir@...zon.com,
        sjitindarsingh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: Fix potential races when performing online
 resizing

Hi Suraj,

All of the patches to fix BZ 206443 are now on the ext4 git tree:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/log/?h=dev

I'm currently giving them a full regression test set using xfstests.
Could you run your tests to make sure it looks good for you?

I'm hoping to issue a pull request to Linus in time for 5.6-rc3 by
this weekend.

Also, if you can figure out a way to package up the repro as an
xfstests test case, that would be really excellent.  I think the
challenge is that some of them took a *huge* amount of pounding before
they repro'ed, correct?  I wasn't actually able to trigger the repro
using kvm, but I was only using a 2 CPU configuration.

Thanks,

						- Ted