[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224215743.GA24044@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:57:43 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/24] btrfs: Convert from readpages to readahead
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:54:14PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > First I think the implicit ARRAY_SIZE in readahead_page_batch is highly
> > dangerous, as it will do the wrong thing when passing a pointer or
> > function argument.
>
> somebody already thought of that ;-)
>
> #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
Ok. Still find it pretty weird to design a primary interface that
just works with an array type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists