lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:59 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Barani Muthukumaran <bmuthuku@....qualcomm.com>, Kuohong Wang <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>, Kim Boojin <boojin.kim@...sung.com>, Ladvine D Almeida <Ladvine.DAlmeida@...opsys.com>, Parshuram Raju Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] scsi: ufs: Add inline encryption support to UFS On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 09:47:36PM +0800, Stanley Chu wrote: > Yes, MediaTek is keeping work closely with inline encryption patch sets. > Currently the v6 version can work well (without > UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_CRYPTO quirk) at least in our MT6779 SoC platform > which basic SoC support and some other peripheral drivers are under > upstreaming as below link, > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?state=% > 2A&q=6779&series=&submitter=&delegate=&archive=both > > The integration with inline encryption patch set needs to patch > ufs-mediatek and patches are ready in downstream. We plan to upstream > them soon after inline encryption patch sets get merged. What amount of support do you need in ufs-mediatek? It seems like pretty much every ufs low-level driver needs some kind of specific support now, right? I wonder if we should instead opt into the support instead of all the quirking here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists