linux-ext4 - Re: [LSFMMBPF TOPIC] Killing LSFMMBPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe749d05-9aaf-3a21-3aef-89aaa9ca93c6@suse.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:04:01 +0200
From:   Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        lsf-pc <lsf-pc@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSFMMBPF TOPIC] Killing LSFMMBPF



On 6.03.20 г. 16:35 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
> 

<snip>

> 
> 1) The invitation process.  We've tried many different things, and I
> think we generally do a good job here, but the fact is if I don't know
> somebody I'm not going to give them a very high rating, making it
> difficult to actually bring in new people.

FWIW I've always found the invitation-only requirement somewhat
off-putting hence haven't attended.

<snip>