[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <27f3cc91-fd3c-b806-bbd6-fb10b0a86ea0@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:37:27 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Ext4 corruption with VM images as 3 > drop_caches
On 3/19/20 10:06 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed 18-03-20 09:17:51, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> With new vm install I am finding corruption with the vm image if I
>> follow up the install with echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>>
>> The file system reports below error.
>>
>> Begin: Running /scripts/local-bottom ... done.
>> Begin: Running /scripts/init-bottom ...
>> [ 4.916017] EXT4-fs error (device vda2): ext4_lookup:1700: inode #787185: comm sh: iget: checksum invalid
>> done.
>> [ 5.244312] EXT4-fs error (device vda2): ext4_lookup:1700: inode #917954: comm init: iget: checksum invalid
>> [ 5.257246] EXT4-fs error (device vda2): ext4_lookup:1700: inode #917954: comm init: iget: checksum invalid
>> /sbin/init: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: Error 74
>> [ 5.271207] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00007f00
>>
>> And debugfs reports
>>
>> debugfs: stat <917954>
>> Inode: 917954 Type: bad type Mode: 0000 Flags: 0x0
>> Generation: 0 Version: 0x00000000
>> User: 0 Group: 0 Size: 0
>> File ACL: 0
>> Links: 0 Blockcount: 0
>> Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0
>> ctime: 0x00000000 -- Wed Dec 31 18:00:00 1969
>> atime: 0x00000000 -- Wed Dec 31 18:00:00 1969
>> mtime: 0x00000000 -- Wed Dec 31 18:00:00 1969
>> Size of extra inode fields: 0
>> Inode checksum: 0x00000000
>> BLOCKS:
>> debugfs:
>>
>> Bisecting this finds
>> Commit 244adf6426ee31a83f397b700d964cff12a247d3("ext4: make
>> dioread_nolock the default") as bad. If I revert the same on top of linus
>> upstream(fb33c6510d5595144d585aa194d377cf74d31911) I don't hit the
>> corrupttion anymore.
>
> Thanks for report and the bisection! Is this guest or host kernel that you
> were bisecting? I presume host but I want to make sure.
>
host kernel. W.r.t guest kernel, it is not dependent on guest kernel
version. I was able to recreate with different guest kernel versions
(ubuntu 5.3.0-42-generic kernel and also with upstream)
-aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists