linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH V7 9/9] Documentation/dax: Update Usage section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:04:57 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 9/9] Documentation/dax: Update Usage section

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:15 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:21:26PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:41 PM <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Update the Usage section to reflect the new individual dax selection
> > > functionality.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Changes from V6:
> > >         Update to allow setting FS_XFLAG_DAX any time.
> > >         Update with list of behaviors from Darrick
> > >         https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200409165927.GD6741@magnolia/
> > >
> > > Changes from V5:
> > >         Update to reflect the agreed upon semantics
> > >         https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200405061945.GA94792@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com/
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 163 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
> > > index 679729442fd2..af14c1b330a9 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
> > > @@ -17,11 +17,171 @@ For file mappings, the storage device is mapped directly into userspace.
> > >  Usage
> > >  -----
> > >
> > > -If you have a block device which supports DAX, you can make a filesystem
> > > +If you have a block device which supports DAX, you can make a file system
> > >  on it as usual.  The DAX code currently only supports files with a block
> > >  size equal to your kernel's PAGE_SIZE, so you may need to specify a block
> > > -size when creating the filesystem.  When mounting it, use the "-o dax"
> > > -option on the command line or add 'dax' to the options in /etc/fstab.
> > > +size when creating the file system.
> > > +
> > > +Currently 2 filesystems support DAX, ext4 and xfs.  Enabling DAX on them is
> > > +different at this time.
> > > +
> > > +Enabling DAX on ext4
> > > +--------------------
> > > +
> > > +When mounting the filesystem, use the "-o dax" option on the command line or
> > > +add 'dax' to the options in /etc/fstab.
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Enabling DAX on xfs
> > > +-------------------
> > > +
> > > +Summary
> > > +-------
> > > +
> > > + 1. There exists an in-kernel access mode flag S_DAX that is set when
> > > +    file accesses go directly to persistent memory, bypassing the page
> > > +    cache.
> >
> > I had reserved some quibbling with this wording, but now that this is
> > being proposed as documentation I'll let my quibbling fly. "dax" may
> > imply, but does not require persistent memory nor does it necessarily
> > "bypass page cache". For example on configurations that support dax,
> > but turn off MAP_SYNC (like virtio-pmem), a software flush is
> > required. Instead, if we're going to define "dax" here I'd prefer it
> > be a #include of the man page definition that is careful (IIRC) to
> > only talk about semantics and not backend implementation details. In
> > other words, dax is to page-cache as direct-io is to page cache,
> > effectively not there, but dig a bit deeper and you may find it.
>
> Uh, which manpage?  Are you talking about the MAP_SYNC documentation?

No, I was referring to the proposed wording for STATX_ATTR_DAX.
There's no reason for this description to say anything divergent from
that description.