[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422155331.GB20756@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:53:31 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: increase wait time needed before reuse of deleted
inode numbers
On Mon 13-04-20 22:39:25, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Current wait times have proven to be too short to protect against inode
> reuses that lead to metadata inconsistencies.
>
> Now that we will retry the inode allocation if we can't find any
> recently deleted inodes, it's a lot safer to increase the recently
> deleted time from 5 seconds to a minute.
>
> Google-Bug-Id: 36602237
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> index 9faaf32be5cc..4b8c9a9bdf0c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int find_group_other(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
> * block has been written back to disk. (Yes, these values are
> * somewhat arbitrary...)
> */
> -#define RECENTCY_MIN 5
> +#define RECENTCY_MIN 60
> #define RECENTCY_DIRTY 300
>
> static int recently_deleted(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group, int ino)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists