[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200422093730.GC12290@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 02:37:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Barani Muthukumaran <bmuthuku@....qualcomm.com>,
Kuohong Wang <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
Kim Boojin <boojin.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/12] block: blk-crypto-fallback for Inline
Encryption
> diff --git a/Documentation/block/index.rst b/Documentation/block/index.rst
> index 3fa7a52fafa46..026addfc69bc9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/block/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/block/index.rst
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Block
> cmdline-partition
> data-integrity
> deadline-iosched
> + inline-encryption
> ioprio
> kyber-iosched
> null_blk
> diff --git a/block/blk-crypto.c b/block/blk-crypto.c
> index 7546363dc584e..18e1a4d64bd33 100644
> --- a/block/blk-crypto.c
> +++ b/block/blk-crypto.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
> * Copyright 2019 Google LLC
> */
>
> +/*
> + * Refer to Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst for detailed explanation.
> + */
> +
These hunks should be in other patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists