lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200427010444.GF2040@dread.disaster.area>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:04:44 +1000
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, tytso@....edu,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block >
 INT_MAX

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:33:34PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/25/20 5:16 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:40:58PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 04:24:24AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > > > Ok, I see.
> > > > Let me replace WARN() with below pr_warn() line then. If no objections,
> > > > then will send this in a v2 with both patches combined as Darrick
> > > > suggested. - (with Reviewed-by tags of Jan & Christoph).
> > > > 
> > > > pr_warn("fibmap: this would truncate fibmap result\n");
> > > 
> > > We generally don't like userspace to be able to trigger kernel messages
> > > on demand, so they can't swamp the logfiles.  printk_ratelimited()?
> > 
> > Or WARN_ON_ONCE...
> 
> So, Eric was mentioning WARN_** are mostly for kernel side of bugs.
> But this is mostly a API fault which affects user side and also to
> warn the user about the possible truncation in the block fibmap
> addr.
> Also WARN_ON_ONCE, will be shown only once and won't be printed for
> every other file for which block addr > INT_MAX.
> 
> I think we could go with below. If ok, I could post this in v2.
> 
> pr_warn_ratelimited("fibmap: would truncate fibmap result\n");

Please include the process ID, the superblock ID and the task name
that is triggering this warning. Otherwise the administrator will
have no clue what is generating it and so won't be able to fix it...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ