linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.9- ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:59:09 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     ashwin-h <ashwinh@...are.com>
Cc:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...nel.org, srivatsab@...are.com, srivatsa@...il.mit.edu,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, srostedt@...are.com,
        ashwin.hiranniah@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.9- ext4: protect journal inode's
 blocks using block_validity

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:51:34AM +0530, ashwin-h wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file
> handles
> This patch is backported as functionality in this commit is used by
> Patch 2 in this patchset.
> 
> [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity
> Backport to 4.9
> 
> [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal
> [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using
> [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero
> Fixes issues found in Patch 2 in this patchset.
> 
> These patches addresses CVE-2019-19319

I can't take patches for 4.9 that are not also in 4.14, for the obvious
reason that you never want to upgrade to a newer kernel and get
regressions.

So can you provide a backported series for the 4.14 tree too?  Then I
can take these.

thanks,

greg k-h