linux-ext4 - Re: /fs/ext4/namei.c ext4_find_dest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200504195255.GC404484@mit.edu>
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 15:52:55 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jonny Grant <jg@...k.org>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /fs/ext4/namei.c ext4_find_dest_de()

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:38:33AM +0100, Jonny Grant wrote:
> > > I noticed that mkdir() returns EEXIST if a directory already exists.
> > > strerror(EEXIST) text is "File exists"
> > > 
> > > Can ext4_find_dest_de() be amended to return EISDIR if a directory already
> > > exists? This will make the error message clearer.
> > 
> > No; this will confuse potentially a large number of existing programs.
> > Also, the current behavior is required by POSIx and the Single Unix
> > Specification standards.
> > 
> > 	https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/
> > 
> Is it likely POSIX would introduce this change? It's a shame we're still
> constrained by old standards (SVr4, BSD), but it's fine if they can be
> updated.

No, because it has the potential to break existing Unix/Linux/Posix-compliant
programs.  There may very well be C programs doing the following....

	   if (mkdir(filename) < 0) {
	   	if (errno != EEXIST) {
			perror(filename);
			exit(1);
		}
	}

For example, there may very well be implementations of "mkdir -p" that
do precisely this.

If we change the error returned by the mkdir system call as you
propose, it would break these innocent, unsuspecting programs.  That's
not something which will be allowed, because it falls into the
category of a Bad Thing.

Best regards,

						- Ted