[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506093238.GH17863@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 11:32:38 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
tytso@....edu, adilger@...ger.ca, riteshh@...ux.ibm.com,
amir73il@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ext4: remove the access_ok() check in
ext4_ioctl_get_es_cache
On Tue 05-05-20 17:43:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> access_ok just checks we are fed a proper user pointer. We also do that
> in copy_to_user itself, so no need to do this early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> index f81acbbb1b12e..2162db0c747d2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> @@ -754,11 +754,6 @@ static int ext4_ioctl_get_es_cache(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> fieinfo.fi_extents_max = fiemap.fm_extent_count;
> fieinfo.fi_extents_start = ufiemap->fm_extents;
>
> - if (fiemap.fm_extent_count != 0 &&
> - !access_ok(fieinfo.fi_extents_start,
> - fieinfo.fi_extents_max * sizeof(struct fiemap_extent)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> error = ext4_get_es_cache(inode, &fieinfo, fiemap.fm_start,
> fiemap.fm_length);
> fiemap.fm_flags = fieinfo.fi_flags;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists