[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200507145924.GA28854@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:59:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, adilger@...ger.ca,
riteshh@...ux.ibm.com, amir73il@...il.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fix fiemap for ext4 bitmap files (+ cleanups) v3
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:49:47AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:24:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:43:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > the first two patches should fix the issue where ext4 doesn't
> > > properly check the max file size for bitmap files in fiemap.
> > >
> > > The rest cleans up the fiemap support in ext4 and in general.
> >
> > Folks, I think the first two patches should go into 5.7 to fix the
> > ext4 vs overlay problem. Ted, are you going to pick this up, or Al?
>
> I'll pick up the two fixes, thanks. Which tree are the rest of the
> patches going to go through?
vfs.git would be most logic if Al agrees. OTOH there is a fair amount
of ext4 patches, so if you want to pick the series up I wouldn't mind
either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists