linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 12:25:40 +0000
From:   Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Barani Muthukumaran <bmuthuku@....qualcomm.com>,
        Kuohong Wang <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Kim Boojin <boojin.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] Inline Encryption Support

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:41:27AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:48:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I have applied 1-5 for 5.8. Small tweak needed in patch 3 due to a header
> > inclusion, but clean apart from that.
> 
> I looked at this a bit more as it clashed with my outstanding
> q_usage_counter optimization, and I think we should move the
> blk_crypto_bio_prep call into blk-mq, similar to what we do about
> the integrity_prep call.  Comments?
> 
> ---
> From b7a78be7de0f39ef972d6a2f97a3982a422bf3ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:32:40 +0200
> Subject: block: move blk_crypto_bio_prep into blk_mq_make_request
> 
> Currently blk_crypto_bio_prep is called for every block driver, including
> stacking drivers, which is probably not the right thing to do.  Instead
> move it to blk_mq_make_request, similar to how we handle integrity data.
> If we ever grow a low-level make_request based driver that wants
> encryption it will have to call blk_crypto_bio_prep manually, but I really
> hope we don't grow more non-stacking make_request drivers to start with.
One of the nice things about the current design is that regardless of what
request queue an FS sends an encrypted bio to, blk-crypto will be able to handle
the encryption (whether by using hardware inline encryption, or using the
blk-crypto-fallback). The FS itself does not need to worry about what the
request queue is.

But if we move blk_crypto_bio_prep into blk_mq_make_request, the FS loses this
ability to not care about the underlying request queue - it can no longer send a
bio with an encryption context to queue such that q->make_request_fn !=
blk_mq_make_request_fn. To restore that ability, we'll need to add calls to
blk_crypto_bio_prep to every possible make_request_fn (although yes, if we do
decide to add the call to blk_crypto_bio_prep in multiple places, I think it'll
be fine to only add it to the non-stacking make_request_fns).

Also, I tried to look through the patch with the q_usage_counter optimization -
is it this one?

[PATCH 4/4] block: allow blk_mq_make_request to consume the q_usage_counter reference

> 
> This also means we only need to do the crypto preparation after splitting
> and bouncing the bio, which means we don't bother allocating the fallback
> context for a bio that might only be a dummy and gets split or bounced
> later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 13 +++++--------
>  block/blk-mq.c   |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 1e97f99735232..ac59afaa26960 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1131,12 +1131,10 @@ blk_qc_t generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
>  			/* Create a fresh bio_list for all subordinate requests */
>  			bio_list_on_stack[1] = bio_list_on_stack[0];
>  			bio_list_init(&bio_list_on_stack[0]);
> -			if (blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio)) {
> -				if (q->make_request_fn)
> -					ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
> -				else
> -					ret = blk_mq_make_request(q, bio);
> -			}
> +			if (q->make_request_fn)
> +				ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
> +			else
> +				ret = blk_mq_make_request(q, bio);
>  
>  			blk_queue_exit(q);
>  
> @@ -1185,8 +1183,7 @@ blk_qc_t direct_make_request(struct bio *bio)
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  	if (unlikely(bio_queue_enter(bio)))
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> -	if (blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))
> -		ret = blk_mq_make_request(q, bio);
> +	ret = blk_mq_make_request(q, bio);
>  	blk_queue_exit(q);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index d2962863e629f..0b5a0fa0d124b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2033,6 +2033,8 @@ blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
>  	__blk_queue_split(q, &bio, &nr_segs);
>  
> +	if (!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))
> +		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  	if (!bio_integrity_prep(bio))
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>