lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200519030205.GB954@sol.localdomain> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 20:02:05 -0700 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> Cc: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2 On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 04:32:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> > > > > v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new > > features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2. > > > > Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for > > encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies. > > > > To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or > > "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no > > argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting > > -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2. > > > > To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support > > specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting > > "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a > > pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags. > > > > To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set > > or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but > > xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.) > > > > Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, > > there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and > > ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored > > inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from > > 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> > > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> > > Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this? > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > index 04bfaf63752c..6c9fc9e21c13 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard); > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(meta_bg_resize); > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(encryption); > +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(test_dummy_encryption_v2); > #endif > #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(casefold); > @@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { > ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize), > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > ATTR_LIST(encryption), > + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2), > #endif > #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE > ATTR_LIST(casefold), > > This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know > whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 > will work, and whether test_dummy_encryption tests v1 or v2. > Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"? - Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists