lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520200242.GG3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 13:02:42 -0700
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:     Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Li Xi <lixi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 7/8] fs/ext4: Introduce DAX inode flag

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:26:44PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On May 19, 2020, at 11:57 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > 
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > 
> > Add a flag to preserve FS_XFLAG_DAX in the ext4 inode.
> > 
> > Set the flag to be user visible and changeable.  Set the flag to be
> > inherited.  Allow applications to change the flag at any time with the
> > exception of if VERITY or ENCRYPT is set.
> > 
> > Disallow setting VERITY or ENCRYPT if DAX is set.
> > 
> > Finally, on regular files, flag the inode to not be cached to facilitate
> > changing S_DAX on the next creation of the inode.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > index 6235440e4c39..467c30a789b6 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > @@ -415,13 +415,16 @@ struct flex_groups {
> > #define EXT4_VERITY_FL			0x00100000 /* Verity protected inode */
> > #define EXT4_EA_INODE_FL	        0x00200000 /* Inode used for large EA */
> > /* 0x00400000 was formerly EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL */
> > +
> > +#define EXT4_DAX_FL			0x01000000 /* Inode is DAX */
> > +
> > #define EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL		0x10000000 /* Inode has inline data. */
> > #define EXT4_PROJINHERIT_FL		0x20000000 /* Create with parents projid */
> > #define EXT4_CASEFOLD_FL		0x40000000 /* Casefolded file */
> > #define EXT4_RESERVED_FL		0x80000000 /* reserved for ext4 lib */
> 
> Hi Ira,
> This flag value conflicts with the reserved flag in e2fsprogs for snapshots:
> 
> #define EXT4_SNAPFILE_FL                0x01000000  /* Inode is a snapshot */

Sure NP but is that new?  I'm building off of 5.7-rc4.

Just curious if I completely missed something.

> 
> Please change EXT4_DAX_FL and FS_DAX_FL to use 0x02000000, which is not used
> for anything in either case.

NP, thanks!
Ira

> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > index 379a612f8f1d..7c5f6eb51e2d 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ struct fsxattr {
> > #define FS_EA_INODE_FL			0x00200000 /* Inode used for large EA */
> > #define FS_EOFBLOCKS_FL			0x00400000 /* Reserved for ext4 */
> > #define FS_NOCOW_FL			0x00800000 /* Do not cow file */
> > +#define FS_DAX_FL			0x01000000 /* Inode is DAX */
> > #define FS_INLINE_DATA_FL		0x10000000 /* Reserved for ext4 */
> > #define FS_PROJINHERIT_FL		0x20000000 /* Create with parents projid */
> > #define FS_CASEFOLD_FL			0x40000000 /* Folder is case insensitive */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ