linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC 00/16] ext4: mballoc/extents: Code cleanup and debug improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200528142047.GD228632@mit.edu>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 10:20:47 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/16] ext4: mballoc/extents: Code cleanup and debug
 improvements

On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:54:40AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> This series does some code refactoring/cleanups and debug logs improvements
> around mb_debug() and ext_debug(). These were found when working over
> improving mballoc ENOSPC handling in ext4.
> These should be small and stright forward patches for reviewing.

I've applied all but the last patch ("Add process namd and pid in
ext4_msg"), which I think needs a bit more discussion.

	    	    	  	      - Ted